Aurangzeb: The most hated man in India
Book Review
Boon Name: Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth
Author: Audrey Truschke
Hardcover: 216 pages
Publisher: Penguin Random House India (10 February 2017)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0670089818
ISBN-13: 978-0670089819
Package Dimensions: 20.2 x 12.8 x 2.6 cm
By Daanish Bin
Nabi
daanishnabi@gmail.com
The two Muslim kings of subcontinent - Sultan Alauddin Khalji
and Emperor Aurangzeb - have remained shred in controversy since last few
decades. The controversy is about whether they were bigots or pious rulers.
Dissecting this myth between bigotry and piousness, comes the lucid account
“Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth” by scholar and assistant professor of South
Asian history Audrey Truschke.
The book unmasks many aspect of Aurangzeb Alamgir who ruled
for 49 years over 150 million people. The author tells us since Aurangzeb was a
prince, his life was nothing short of a tumult storm. When Shah Jahan took ill,
a brutal war ensued between the four sons of Shah Jahan for Delhi’s throne. It
was Aurangzeb who emerged victorious by killing two of his brothers while third
one was exiled. He also imprisoned his aged father Shah Jahan, who spent his
last seven and half years at Delhi’s majestic Red Fort under house arrest.
“Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth” has talked in detail about
the accession to Mughal throne soon after the Shah Jahan. The wars between Dara
Shukoh, Shah Shuja, Murad and Aurangzeb (four sons of Shah Jahan) led to
thousands of death in two years before Aurangzeb’s coronation took place.
Truschke writes that these personal brutal experiences -
which Aurungzeb faced during his early life as emperor - made him realise the importance
of justice (adl); which he tried to peruse throughout his rule of 49 years.
However, he was brutal in his conduct whenever he felt threat from anyone to
the mighty Mughal Empire. He even did not leave his relatives in the pursuit of
saving the Empire.
Alamgir:
The bigot
The author writes that the current versions of Aurangzeb are
more fiction than reality. She argues that over the centuries many commentators
have spread the myth of the evil and bigoted Aurangzeb on the basis of
shockingly thin evidences. Through her scholarly work, Truschke proves that
ideas like the last Mughal Emperor destroyed thousands of temples and massacred
millions of Hindus are nothing but myth as none of these facts is supported by
historical evidences.
Alamgir and
Hindus
Writing about the Emperor’s Hindu penchants, she writes, that
he always consulted a Hindu ascetics on health issues. She argues that
Aurangzeb had more Hindus in his administration than his Mughal predecessors.
Quoting figures, Truschke writes that under the great Akbar,
Hindu constituted 22.5 percent of all Mughal nobles. This percentage hardly saw
spikes during the reign of either Emperor Jehangir or Emperor Shah Jahan.
However, writes the author, under Aurangzeb, Hindu
participation increased at all levels. There was an increase of 50 percent. The
Hindus rose to 31.6 percent of the Mughal nobility in the Mughal state during
the reign of Aurangzeb. Thus breaking the myth that Aurangzeb was a Muslim
zealot and slaughtered Hindus on a large scale.
“Aurangzeb:
The Man and the Myth” talks about a Hindu astrologer Ishvardasa’s views
about the Alamgir. In 1663, Ishvardasa wrote in Sanskrit that Aurangzeb is
righteous (dharmya) and that the tax policies were lawful (vidhvivat).
Alamgir and
temples
The book has chronicled in detail about the myth that
thousands of temples were destroyed by Aurangzeb. Truschke writes that Hindu
and Jain temples dotted the landscape of Mughal Empire and these places were
entitled to Mughal state protection. She argues that there are numerous gaping
holes in the proposition that Aurangzeb razed temples because he hated Hindus.
The last emperor of undivided India, had thousands of Hindu temples within his
domains.
Quoting Richard Eaton, the leading authority on the subject
(destruction of temples in India), Truschke writes that the number of confirmed
temple destructions during Aurangzeb’s rule were just over a dozen, with fewer
tied to Alamgir’s direct command. She argues the other few temples that were
brought down by the Aurangzeb were sought to punish political missteps by
temple associates. Aurangzeb’s point that: ‘Kings represent God on earth and
are thus obliged to ensure peace among religious communities.’
An interesting story about Alamgir’s early acts as an emperor
has been detailed in “Aurangzeb: The Man
and the Myth”. The story goes like this: During the early days Alamgir
issued an imperial order (farman) to local Mughal officials at Benares (present
day Banaras). Truschke writes that it directed them to halt any interference in
the affairs of local temples. This farman is in backdrop of when Alamgir had
learned that some Hindu residents of Benares have been harassed including a
group of Brahimns who were in charge of ancient temples there.
Truschke writes that the Emperor then ordered his officials
that: “You must see that nobody
unlawfully disturbs the Brahmins or other Hindus so that they might remain in
their traditional place and pray for the continuance of the Empire.”
She argues that the ending of the 1659 Benares farman became
a common refrain in the many imperial commands penned by Aurangzeb that
protected the temples and their caretakers.
Truschke has meticulously penned down about how many acres of
land were distributed by the Emperor for temple building and how Aurangzeb
encouraged stipends to Hindu scholars and other Hindu priests for their
research and scholar work to be carried out in preaching Hinduism.
Alamgir:
The administrator
Audrey Truschke argues that Aurangzeb was an astute
administrator when it came to administer his vast Empire. The book sheds light
on how Aurangzeb made lasting contribution to the interpretation and exercise
of legal codes and was renowned by people of all religious groups for his
justice.
To oversee his vast empire which required a vast bureaucratic
apparatus, Aurangzeb kept apprised of happenings with the aid of prolific news
bulletins (akhbarat) that arrived daily and reported on princely courts.
An able writer, Alamgir used to write letters to his sons,
grandsons, noble, and other government officials about various aspects of his
kingdom. Truschke writes that he regularly wrote to important nobles about
ensuring the safety of the roads and chided them from failing to prevent theft
and other cries against ordinary subjects.
Truschke has also discusses about the diwani (chief finance
minister) Raja Raghunatha of the Emperor. Raja Raghunatha stabilized the vast
economy of the Empire. Truschke quotes a letter of Aurangzeb written during his
final day to other administrators. In this letter, the ageing Emperor, has
cited Raghunatha’s advice about running an efficient government.
The author writes that for Aurangzeb, Raghunatha’s religious
identity was irrelevant to his memorialised status as a great officer to the
Mughal Empire.
In one of his letter to an administrator, Alamgir wrote, “So long as a single breath of this mortal
life remains, there is no release from labour and work.”
Shivaji:
The foe
The Maratha warrior Shivaji was the most formidable foe of
the Mughal Emperor. Author writes that to pursue Shivaji, Aurangzeb assigned
job to Mirza Jai Singh. After being besieged by Jai Singh in Purandar hill,
Shivaji surrendered.
Truschke writes that Shivaji visited the imperial court at
Agra in the year 1666. This was the only time Aurangzeb and Shivaji met
face-to-face.
Quoting different researches, the author quotes different
stories about what transcribed between the two leaders at the Imperial court.
It was from this moment onwards that Shivaji became a permanent foe of
Aurangzeb and the Mughal Empire.
The other foe that Aurangzeb faced was the Sikh Guru Tegh
Bahadur (whom “he” executed in 1675).
However, like the story of Shivaji, Audrey Truschke has not elaborated on this
subject.
Alamgir’s
Deccan expedition
The author writes that throughout Aurangzeb’s reign, he
crushed rebellions and waged wars of expansion and oversaw sieges, especially
in Deccan during his later years. She writes that he would often use diplomacy
to extend and solidify Mughal power.
“Aurangzeb:
The Man and the Myth” says that the Alamgir spent his second half
(1681-1707) in south annexing many small kingdoms into the imperial fold of
Mughal as far as Tamil Nadu. These wars came to known as the Deccan wars or
Mughal-Maratha Wars. A detailed account of Aurangzeb’s long halt in Deccan is
also provided in the book. The author says that these long halts demoralised
the Mughal forces. Audrey Truschke writes that even when Aurangzeb was in his
eighties he still perused with these Deccan wars.
The book also talks in details about the rebellion clan of
Rajput, which Aurangzeb had to deal with.
Alamgir as
Muslim
“Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth” also provides an insight about
how practising Muslim the Emperor was. The author says that he had memorised
the Holy Quran in 1660s and during his later years he sewed prayers caps and
also wrote the Quran by hand.
Quoting Bhimsen Saxena, a Hindu soldier in Aurangzeb’s
employ, Truschke writes that Alamgir once threw a written prayer into flooded
waters and it caused the flood water to subside. Among many letters that have
been quoted in the book, the Emperor in one of his letters, he wrote to his
grandson Azimusshan, writes that ‘you
should consider the protection of the subjects as the sources of happiness in
this world and the next.’
Truschke further writes that the Emperor ran into repeated
problems regarding his public relationship with Islam. When the two conflicted,
Aurangzeb generally sacrificed religious obligations on the altar of state
interests although such decisions weighed heavily on his heart.
In another example of his Muslim leanings, the author, citing
an unknown historian, writes that Aurangzeb dismounted during a military clash
in order to pray as an expression of devotion that also buoyed his troops with
the confidence that Allah was on their side. She says that for Aurangzeb, a
preoccupation with dispensing justice (adl),
existed alongside his thirst for earthly power.
Alamgir’s
death
Aurangzeb was born on November 3, 1618 in Dohad, Gujarat. He
died a peaceful and natural death in 1707, as suggested by the book.
The author writes that at the time of his death, the
population of the Mughal kingdom was double that of contemporary Europe, and
Mughal landholdings reached an all-time high.
He is buried at Khuldabad, Maharashtra in a simple manner. He
is not buried like imposing tombs of his predecessors like Humayun and Shah
Jahan, writes Truschke.
She writes that he was buried in accordance with his wishes,
the tomb was plain and unmarked. Unlike other Mughal Emperors who have
attracted significant attention from historians, Aurangzeb has been neglected
over the past several decades.